Hmm...
Compressor: 'ULY2', Ut Video Codec YUV422 (ULY2) x86
Editing in Adobe Premiere 6.0
Source resolution: 720x304
Sped up some clips.. those clips render as horrible looking purple-yellow-blue with vertical lines
wut
Hmm...
Compressor: 'ULY2', Ut Video Codec YUV422 (ULY2) x86
Editing in Adobe Premiere 6.0
Source resolution: 720x304
Sped up some clips.. those clips render as horrible looking purple-yellow-blue with vertical lines
wut
That's strange. UT Video always works for me and I use those exact same settings. Of course, I've never used Adobe Premiere, so I'm not really sure what the problem could be.
Based on the 720x304 resolution, I'm assuming you're dealing with some sort of web release, but that's all I could really decipher from that.
Just when you thought I couldn't become any more conceited.
Spoiler!
I dunno about you guys, but I think this would make an awesome ending song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrdEM...eature=related
Reminds me of Iron Maiden can't wot till August.
People don't realize the difficulty of working with 254 clips in an NLE program. CS5.5 won't even import that many clips at once. It crashes. If I could get Premiere 6.0 to not render sections of video as garbage when I change the speed of the clip, I would be done with the credits by now. Thanks Ut Video codec! >:0 I guess I'll have to re-render everything as lagarith on my desktop to get this done.
People just need to realize that the editing programs their making are crap and can't handle a proper workload.
instead of trying to do everyclip at once do a small amount of clips.
make several videos using about 20 amvs save it then do it again until your done.
Then once you'll have 12 videos to work with instead of 254.
finished product.
you could also try organizing the clips in a word document to help keep track of the order you want them in.
![]()
lick,lick,lick,
nom,nom,nom
Jinzo64 On Youtube
Jinzo64 On Vimeo
Now on Skype Jinzo64.
psn-sakurasakamoto
Accurate representation of the image quality of the average AMV Hell 6 video submission:
![]()
Last edited by ssgwnbtd; 06-08-2012 at 10:07 PM.
I guess some people are are too inept to download raws, too cheap to buy DVDs, don't know how to encode, or some combination of all three.
There's really no excuse for footage of that poor quality anymore.
Just when you thought I couldn't become any more conceited.
Spoiler!
Not with the power of the internet. Just about any digital content you want can be found with some effort.
And even if you don't have good internet, you can still probably get DVDs shipped to wherever you are, given a little time and effort. Or is effort a foreign concept now?
Just when you thought I couldn't become any more conceited.
Spoiler!
Laziness is easy work is hard.
That's plausible, I suppose, but there are ways to properly extract footage from files like that. My computer can hardly play high-definition files, but I still manage to make clips in respectable quality. It just requires the right conversion tools, is all.
Just when you thought I couldn't become any more conceited.
Spoiler!
![]()
lick,lick,lick,
nom,nom,nom
Jinzo64 On Youtube
Jinzo64 On Vimeo
Now on Skype Jinzo64.
psn-sakurasakamoto