Last Post Wins

[Guthix]

Alright, I'm a total lying faggot and I'm chiming in. This is at Guthix, who I can't quote because he accidentally put his response in another quote. The argument that anime should be spared criticism for doing stupid crap that gets attention because it has the mask of super-deformed candy-colored cuteness to appeal to man-children is a crappy argument (don't get me wrong, we all clearly like anime here). Then you go and reference FLCL as an example for the argument and go so far as to needlessly define it as something that pays no heed to conventional writing and predetermined plot (also, I personally just didn't like that show).

you seem to have missed the point, ANIME CAN BE COMPLETELY RETARDED AND STILL HAVE SOME WATCHING VALUE, while such things in real life are simply mind degradation.
i know using FLCL was an extreeme example, yes its retarded, yes it pisses me off to no tomorow, but i watched it all and i found it interesting because it was different then most anime and probably nothing that current producer could crap out in hollywood, even the "deep" plot pieces made more sense then the matrix. Have you ever asked yourself this question. Anime can look like real people [drawing those isnt that, deadly there are some anime which do that, but theyr not popular], so why dont people do it? why dont they make realistic anime? its simply because they can, and on top of that is still enjoyable, it doesnt matter that the character has eyes 3 times bigger then in the human anatomy as long as it looks nice.you can't equalize madoka with kamen raider because they are differently made with a different audience view, what doesnt make sense in action movies, can make in an simply because there are different rules [or less rules].

also i think musicals are ****

[hosokawa37]

Internet is still down at my house, so I will def not be on AMV Hell as much for a while. If u need to catch [for whatever reason], I should be on around the late morning/early afternoon time [EDT] until I get the net fixed at my house

[Backmask]

you can't equalize madoka with kamen raider because they are differently made with a different audience view, what doesnt make sense in action movies, can make in an simply because there are different rules [or less rules].

This is by far the second dumbest thing I've ever read. So I take it that - because they are two different mediums with two different demographics in mind - James Cameron's Avatar did not blatantly plagiarize from Call Me Joe? The plagiarism claim against Madoka comes from the fact that many - if not all - of the plot-points and characters were completely ripped-off from Ryuki. This isn't a matter of, "Nope. Different demographics. Can't be plagiarism (Which is a ****ing retarded belief, by the way)."

It should also be noted that the writer himself, Gen Urobuchi, stated that, and I quote, "Ryuki was a masterpiece with its battle royal style. It's okay to have a few similarities." Of course, "a few" is an understatement. Need I say more?

[HaarTheDragonlord]

So I take it that - because they are two different mediums with two different demographics in mind - James Cameron's Avatar did not blatantly plagiarize from Call Me Joe?

And here I was thinking that Avatar ripped of Battle Angel Alita and Gundam Seed. Of course, I did "deduct" that when I was like 15.

[Arock]

i always thought avatar was dances with wolves except with big blue alien Indians

[Backmask]

i always thought avatar was dances with wolves except with big blue alien Indians

In Call Me Joe, the paraplegic main character, Ed Anglesey, connects to an artificial, blue, alien body, named Joe, to explore, adapt, and find information on the planet via a "bed" that connects his mind to the aforementioned body. In the end of the novel, Ed permanently fuses his mind into Joe's body. Now, what do we get when we hamfistedly toss in some basic Romeo and Juliet tropes?

[Guthix]

This is by far the second dumbest thing I've ever read. So I take it that - because they are two different mediums with two different demographics in mind - James Cameron's Avatar did not blatantly plagiarize from Call Me Joe? The plagiarism claim against Madoka comes from the fact that many - if not all - of the plot-points and characters were completely ripped-off from Ryuki. This isn't a matter of, "Nope. Different demographics. Can't be plagiarism (Which is a ****ing retarded belief, by the way)."

It should also be noted that the writer himself, Gen Urobuchi, stated that, and I quote, "Ryuki was a masterpiece with its battle royal style. It's okay to have a few similarities." Of course, "a few" is an understatement. Need I say more?

gotta go for nr 1.
also you still dont get my point so **** it.copying others is nothing new, the concept of movies is also copying real life, but no one bitches about it. Atleast i got to see the ripped off plot points, because i dont feel watching the live action ****.

[tengutenga]

*

If you think about it, AMV Hell clips are more MADs than AMVs.

[Arock]

^what is the point that this post

[SplitReality]

^what is the point that this post

What's the point of yours?

[Kaiju]

Whats the point of this thread? Whats the point of life if it's ultimately pointless? What is the point of having a fetish if you are just going to die alone without meeting someone who shares it? What is a game without achievements? What is a Man?

[Arock]

What's the point of yours?

could ask the same question to you, and the point of mine was boredom

[thedarkmessenger]

What's a "MAD" and how is it different from an AMV?

[SplitReality]

What's a "MAD" and how is it different from an AMV?

A MAD is our ****** slave of a mod whom we bend to our will daily, while an AMV is a music video made with anime.

[thedarkmessenger]

^I'm not talking about the mod xP