NodMan
10-28-2011, 12:14 AM
Well I have been playing this game called Vindictus, since the closed Beta. I always try to let people know about it because it is a rather fun game. It uses the Source Engine from Valve (the same game engine that runs TF2 and CS:S). So if you want to try it out go for it.

Vindictus Home Page (http://vindictus.nexon.net/Default.aspx)

Character videos;

Fiona (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQNCd7iB94A)
Evie (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d28qK-3aosM)
Lann (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-GBQag6Wbk)
Karok (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuuSBD9WX2A)
Transformation Skill (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFYgbmYdiLU)

Anyhoot if you play it and want to play sometime, I'm the West Server under Zevv (Fiona)/Fantomah (Evie)/Jizai (Lann)/Antiaos (Karok).

P.S. My Guild is Book of Mormon. Nothing to do with Religion, just thought the South Park of it was funny and wanted a Guild named after that.

Zuiichi
10-28-2011, 12:57 AM
meh i might give it a swing

N.P.C.C.
10-28-2011, 04:11 AM
Hmm...I'm tempted to but i can't afford becoming addicted to a game right now. I'll bookmark this and come back to try it out when i have more time to kill. Thanks for the recommendation.

NodMan
10-28-2011, 07:03 AM
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/3602/201110270005.jpg

abyssion1337
10-28-2011, 09:35 AM
As you already know I have a low level Fiona and Evie

SplitReality
10-28-2011, 11:53 AM
I'd try it, looks awesome. But I'm not sure how much I'd lag if I play west servers given I'm on the east coast.

LOLWTFBBQ
10-28-2011, 05:07 PM
at first it looked tempting, but then I saw this:


It uses the Source Engine from Valve (the same game engine that runs TF2 and CS:S).


this would have to be a damn sweet game for me to overlook that annoying flaw

Zuiichi
10-28-2011, 05:58 PM
the valve engine is the best engine in da world

mattroks101
10-28-2011, 06:01 PM
Have it. It's fun.

Guthix
10-28-2011, 06:40 PM
the valve engine is the best engine in da world

its also the most crowded one in the world
edit. watched links + some extra kinda reminds me of silk road

LOLWTFBBQ
10-28-2011, 07:38 PM
the valve engine is the best engine in da world

Valve's engine, the Source engine, is pathetic. its graphics and physics are dwarfed by the CryEngine 3, Frostbite Engine 2, and RAGE engine.

the only reason it is widely used is because it can run on a ****ing windows 98. instead of making a new engine Valve just keeps updating and patching the same bugged one. the engine has yet to show any signs of environmental destructibility, only scripted events, and I dont believe it has made the jump to DX11.

amusing games do not equal robust engine

SplitReality
10-28-2011, 08:22 PM
Tutorial shows me that things are destructible. I blew apart walls boxes and barrels with my magic. Game looks completely awesome.

NodMan
10-28-2011, 09:42 PM
Valve's engine, the Source engine, is pathetic. its graphics and physics are dwarfed by the CryEngine 3, Frostbite Engine 2, and RAGE engine.

the only reason it is widely used is because it can run on a ****ing windows 98. instead of making a new engine Valve just keeps updating and patching the same bugged one. the engine has yet to show any signs of environmental destructibility, only scripted events, and I dont believe it has made the jump to DX11.

amusing games do not equal robust engine

Try it before you say that. In what MMO can you pick up an enemy throw him at his buddies on a bridge, destroying that bridge and watching them all fall to their deaths? Or how about being able to destroy a pillar and picking up part of it to beat mobs/bosses to death? There is also the deal with being able to grab mobs (all but Evie) and either slamming them into walls head first or pile driving them into objects. Add on top of that every class (expect Karok, because once he throws his pillar he can just punch unarmed) has two different weapons that make each weapon play completely different. Now I know that the Source Engine isn't as good as the Cry3 or Rage however what they have done with it in this game is rather mind blowing.

P.S. You also have secondary weapons that you only get a limited amount of. They range from leg binding Chains to Sticky Bombs.

P.P.S. You can also kill bosses and take their weapons.

http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/289/201110280001.jpg

Zuiichi
10-28-2011, 09:47 PM
Valve's engine, the Source engine, is pathetic. its graphics and physics are dwarfed by the CryEngine 3, Frostbite Engine 2, and RAGE engine.

the only reason it is widely used is because it can run on a ****ing windows 98. instead of making a new engine Valve just keeps updating and patching the same bugged one. the engine has yet to show any signs of environmental destructibility, only scripted events, and I dont believe it has made the jump to DX11.

amusing games do not equal robust engine

So the greatest up and coming game company is running a crappy engine that everyone seems to keep buying millions of games from them......i'll take majority vote thank you

SplitReality
10-28-2011, 10:17 PM
I'll be bouncing around the eastern server as Sirea.

abyssion1337
10-29-2011, 12:18 AM
Valve's engine, the Source engine, is pathetic. its graphics and physics are dwarfed by the CryEngine 3, Frostbite Engine 2, and RAGE engine.

the only reason it is widely used is because it can run on a ****ing windows 98. instead of making a new engine Valve just keeps updating and patching the same bugged one. the engine has yet to show any signs of environmental destructibility, only scripted events, and I dont believe it has made the jump to DX11.

amusing games do not equal robust engine

I love it when people who have no idea wtf they're talking about bash engines. There's a really good reason the source engine is so widely used, because it's a good engine.

NodMan
10-29-2011, 02:27 AM
That and it is free open source. Goodluck trying to make a mod for the Rage engine and not getting sued.

LOLWTFBBQ
10-29-2011, 03:39 AM
its open source and very simple, which makes it very easy to make **** with. why do you think there are so many silly looking vids with characters from Valves games? because with simply Gary's Mod you can access a fair amount of stuff without needing to know much coding or C++. I just think it's half-assed fom that reason, its way too simple for me. ALL of valves games are EXTREMELY linear, they each have very simple textures, and even recicled sound effects (though we all know thats just for nostalgia)

with the large sum of monies Valve makes, I dont see why they take 3+ years to make a title that could be developed by a medium modding group themselves. if they have so many sales, and therefor some much money, why cant they make a new engine with better graphics that can handle DX11? though DX11 is still in early development stages, Im just giving that as an example

and dont go saying Portal 2 was so amazing. it was all linear with skyboxes and the same textures over and over, the game was so bland it was under 6 GB, its only redeaming factor was the ending.

abyssion1337
10-29-2011, 03:47 AM
your attitude towards the source engine and valve has never made sense to me, I guess if you're the kind of person that doesn't like that sort of thing then say so but most of criticism of valve aren't actually things that reflect poorly on them so much as a way, a completely valid way of doing things. If you don't like linear games then don't play them but don't bitch us about them because they're inherently no better or worse than other games. Actually if you only like games that make utilizes that most of the most state of the art engines for the best graphic fidelity then you should just go away, because you're so superficial you'll never play many truly great games and you aren't a real gamer; You're just an elitist.

XelaisPWN
10-29-2011, 06:54 AM
Awww ****, yo, we got a flamewar goin' on up in this bitch

...but seriously, Abyss is right. There's nothing inherently "better" or "worse" about linear or open games. I know you hate the Source engine, but go try The Stanley Parable. It's free and it won't take you more than ten minutes-half an hour or so to explore (depending on how curious you get about the endings. there are lots). It makes some great points about linearity and the choices a gamer makes and it does it cleverly. TRY and look past the game's inferior graphics and look at its brilliant writing.

Y'know, come to think of it, people like you are what are seriously hurting gaming. Driving up development costs and development times, alienating people from PC gaming because their $400 best buy PC can't run the games- all because "lol i want it to look purdy." I assume you're a Minecraft hater as well, just because it doesn't look good. Whatever happened to games just being fun? Not to mention that "good" these days is "brown (http://playstation4.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/battlefield-3-trailer.jpg) & grey (http://media.bestofmicro.com/ID-Tech-5-Carmack-rage,7-Q-219302-13.jpg) & bloom (https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/G/01/videogames/detail-page/B000X9FV5M-1-lg.jpg)." How the **** do you stand that?

I love Valve, don't get me wrong. Sure, the source engine is a bit outdated. Sure, their development times are kind of through the roof (such is life when you're also the publisher- on PC, anyway). But I can look past that for great gameplay and/or a well crafted story that could never have been told through any other medium.

Sorry if that text doesn't have enough bloom for you. Here you go, should be readable now. (http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/7656/lotsofbloom.png)

As far as Vindictus goes, color me interested, but I dunno if I have the time or money for it at the moment.

abyssion1337
10-29-2011, 09:36 AM
Xelais,
1. Word
2. Vindictus is FTP

NodMan
10-29-2011, 10:17 AM
Aye, Vindictus is a Free To Play game. There is an Item shop but aside from cosmetic ****, you can get it all in game for free. Also, Evies have great panties.

http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/7466/201110280002.jpg
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/6202/201110280003.jpg
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/4233/201110280007.jpg

Guthix
10-29-2011, 02:29 PM
pantys are atractive but id need evie with teto hairdo to be sold

XelaisPWN
10-29-2011, 05:32 PM
Ah :P well, since money is not an issue I might give it a shot.

SplitReality
10-29-2011, 09:36 PM
I'll just leave this halloween costume here and be on my way...
http://i39.tinypic.com/e82y3k.jpg

http://i41.tinypic.com/2zp1u9h.jpg

abyssion1337
10-29-2011, 10:47 PM
OH Xelias I'm on the west server cause when my friends got me to play they were on the west server. They made the mistake of thinking the east server was for Asia and west was America.

XelaisPWN
10-30-2011, 12:34 AM
xD Yeah, you mentioned. I picked west anyway, because that's what NodMan said :P

abyssion1337
10-30-2011, 01:32 AM
sweet, I deleted my Evey and started a new one, must use Scyth Evey, so we'll be starting out at the same low level

LOLWTFBBQ
10-30-2011, 06:24 AM
your attitude towards the source engine and valve has never made sense to me, I guess if you're the kind of person that doesn't like that sort of thing then say so but most of criticism of valve aren't actually things that reflect poorly on them so much as a way, a completely valid way of doing things. If you don't like linear games then don't play them but don't bitch us about them because they're inherently no better or worse than other games. Actually if you only like games that make utilizes that most of the most state of the art engines for the best graphic fidelity then you should just go away, because you're so superficial you'll never play many truly great games and you aren't a real gamer; You're just an elitist.

Im surprised you havnt called me a troll by now. and actualy, I am biased against valve, most of my argument doesnt even have a foundation other than my opinion (which is pretty much what forums are for, opinion, trolls, and people who know everything)

hey man, gotta try a game at least once, so I did.

why not utilize the most state of the art engines? (excluding the Unreal Engine, that engine is used way too much lol) I dont see whats so superficial with wanting better quality. $50 is too much for a game that lasts less than 8 hours on a linear bland game with no replay value. and I dont understand why a company as noble as Valve would take so long to produce these rather half-assed games (that last part is still only opinion)

thankfully, developers come along that can actualy do worthwhile stuff with the engine that makes it pretty.

what can I say, Im a PC gamer elitist, I enjoy triple A titles and I dont play any handheld consoles. I dont see how that makes me any less of a gamer than you (but you are prolly more of a nerd than I)

anyway, end of flame war and my rant

pics look nice!

NodMan
10-30-2011, 08:56 AM
sweet, I deleted my Evey and started a new one, must use Scyth Evey, so we'll be starting out at the same low level

With enough AP it doesn't matter what weapon you use, their both fun. Like I said though Staff and Scythe play completely different.

More Screen Shots.
http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/5406/201110290002.jpg
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4030/201110280016.jpg
http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/1775/201107040015.jpg
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/9427/201107250001.jpg

hatz300
10-30-2011, 02:44 PM
I might pop in too, i know i've already played it and had an account but i'll need to start a new character on the west server

Chewi105
10-30-2011, 10:07 PM
my bro was playin this when i was at his house. looked like it was very glitchy and hard to play... i dunno. he also said the tech support doesnt give a hard **** about anything :/

abyssion1337
10-30-2011, 11:05 PM
Im surprised you havnt called me a troll by now. and actualy, I am biased against valve, most of my argument doesnt even have a foundation other than my opinion (which is pretty much what forums are for, opinion, trolls, and people who know everything)

hey man, gotta try a game at least once, so I did.

why not utilize the most state of the art engines? (excluding the Unreal Engine, that engine is used way too much lol) I dont see whats so superficial with wanting better quality. $50 is too much for a game that lasts less than 8 hours on a linear bland game with no replay value. and I dont understand why a company as noble as Valve would take so long to produce these rather half-assed games (that last part is still only opinion)

thankfully, developers come along that can actualy do worthwhile stuff with the engine that makes it pretty.

what can I say, Im a PC gamer elitist, I enjoy triple A titles and I dont play any handheld consoles. I dont see how that makes me any less of a gamer than you (but you are prolly more of a nerd than I)

anyway, end of flame war and my rant

pics look nice!

dude it's not just that last part that is still only opinion, it's the whole rant. I still play HL2 sometimes because its one of the best examples of good design. The story is easy to follow and intuitive, but they don't spell everything out for you, it's perfectly paced from the overall story down to each basic encounter. Aside from your complaint about the graphics, which I don't count, the game is actually perfect. Also valve doesn't charge $50 for any of their games and never has. So to sum that up, it's not superficial to want better quality, it's superficial that the only quality you care about is how it looks.

I also don't see why you're also complaining about the unreal engine, using an already built engine is a huge shortcut and let's face it build an engine is hard, a lot of work and not worth it if there's already an engine that does what you want. I'm beginning to think you don't actually know anything about game design.

SplitReality
10-31-2011, 01:56 AM
my bro was playin this when i was at his house. looked like it was very glitchy and hard to play... i dunno. he also said the tech support doesnt give a hard **** about anything :/

The one downside to this game is the fact that Nexon is in charge of it. Nexon has horrible customer support. Aside from that this game seems to be epic incarnate.

Couple things I've gotten:
Bonus for killing a boss with a kick to the nuts.
Bonus for beating a boss to death with the corpse of one of his minions.
A title for grabbing enemies by the neck and ramming them into walls or breaking their spine.

I've also seen some giant black guy grab a boss and start beating him down with bare fists, ghetto style.

****in' win.

Addition: I've migrated to the west server since I've finally gotten around to testing lag with it.

LOLWTFBBQ
10-31-2011, 05:43 AM
dude it's not just that last part that is still only opinion, it's the whole rant. I still play HL2 sometimes because its one of the best examples of good design. The story is easy to follow and intuitive, but they don't spell everything out for you, it's perfectly paced from the overall story down to each basic encounter. Aside from your complaint about the graphics, which I don't count, the game is actually perfect. Also valve doesn't charge $50 for any of their games and never has. So to sum that up, it's not superficial to want better quality, it's superficial that the only quality you care about is how it looks.

I also don't see why you're also complaining about the unreal engine, using an already built engine is a huge shortcut and let's face it build an engine is hard, a lot of work and not worth it if there's already an engine that does what you want. I'm beginning to think you don't actually know anything about game design.

Too easy to follow. the whole damn jetski level took way too ****ing long, and to make it worse there were stupid segments where you had to get out and solve a physics puzzle, like Valve was trying to say "hey look at our special physics! take 5 minutes to repetetively place cinderblocks on this teeter-totter!) not only that, but you could take the whole level out without making a single difference to the game. Ravenholm was fun, but by the end there was no more scary factor

graphics do count to add immersiveness, but thats just my opinion, and no I do not have a beast machine to max graphics out on.

uhm dude, a google search shows that Left 4 dead 2 (that was the only game I googled) cost $50 and the whole game could have been a $15 DLC map pack because it was nothing new aside from a few weapons and voice actors.

not just graphics, but also sound, many of the sound effects are recicled, like Valve got too lazy and figured people liked the nostalgia.

Im not complaining, I just dont like it. I think the Unreal Engine is great for GoW (360 only) but I think it holds some games back, such as bulletstorm. building a worth-while engine takes at least a year, and a massive studio (cryengine 3 took at least 2 years to make and Crytek is one of the largest developers in the world) so yeah its fine to go ahead and work with something that already exists, but the unreal engine? its kinda bland to me.

Im beginning to think you are simply trying to provoke a reaction from that statement

abyssion1337
10-31-2011, 07:18 AM
Left4dead 2 costs 20, 60 for copies, and that's honestly what I think you're doing.

XelaisPWN
10-31-2011, 08:39 AM
First off... wow, did my entire post get overlooked? It looks like it did. Awesome.

Abyss meant four copies, and while that is true today, I'm pretty sure he meant on release. I think it's important to note that recently valve has been selling games with the promise of new, free expansions down the line, a la Team Fortress 2 (back in the day I suppose- now it's free :P), Portal 2, and, yes, Left 4 Dead 2. Valve is a modern company with a mass distribution pipeline. Why not use it?


graphics do count to add immersiveness, but thats just my opinion, and no I do not have a beast machine to max graphics out on.

You don't have a beast machine to max graphics out on? Why not? Why not utilize the most state of the art hardware to maximize "immersiveness?" I mean, if you're such a self-proclaimed PC gaming elitist, shouldn't you have top of the line hardware?

And I thought you were done with this argument anyway?

At this point I think we are indeed dealing with a troll.

NodMan
10-31-2011, 08:41 AM
I was playing with SplitReality, a little bit ago. He became errect at my Evie's Paladin transformation.

http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/1415/201110300013.jpg
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/4284/201110300015.jpg
http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/5113/201107020020.jpg
http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/8683/201110260009.jpg

abyssion1337
10-31-2011, 11:17 AM
That's ok I didn't overlook your post. Also my machine is top of the line, want to know something interesting: I play borderlands on low settings because the rougher look fits the aesthetic better.

Graphic power very unimportant, aesthetic design, is the only thing that matters when it comes down to how a game looks, it matters a lot actually.

XelaisPWN
10-31-2011, 02:28 PM
...all of that was meant for LOLWTFBBQ xD

SplitReality
10-31-2011, 04:02 PM
I was playing with SplitReality, a little bit ago. He became errect at my Evie's Paladin transformation.


Indeed I did.

On that note whoever else is playing needs to reveal themselves so that we may stalk and-
...
Play.

LOLWTFBBQ
10-31-2011, 05:31 PM
First off... wow, did my entire post get overlooked? It looks like it did. Awesome.

Abyss meant four copies, and while that is true today, I'm pretty sure he meant on release. I think it's important to note that recently valve has been selling games with the promise of new, free expansions down the line, a la Team Fortress 2 (back in the day I suppose- now it's free :P), Portal 2, and, yes, Left 4 Dead 2. Valve is a modern company with a mass distribution pipeline. Why not use it?



You don't have a beast machine to max graphics out on? Why not? Why not utilize the most state of the art hardware to maximize "immersiveness?" I mean, if you're such a self-proclaimed PC gaming elitist, shouldn't you have top of the line hardware?

And I thought you were done with this argument anyway?

At this point I think we are indeed dealing with a troll.

aww dont feel left out! and yes, on release, the game cost $50, go check Steam sales history. but I must say it is pretty awesome that TF2 went free, I have never seen a company be so kind as to just offer up a game free like that.

why not? eh because it costs money I dont have? much as I would love a nice i7 4Ghz processor with quad SLI GTX 590 OC I just dont have the money. besides, Im in the army in 6 months, so why would I blow all that money on something I couldnt enjoy for a long time?

either way, this is what I mean when I say "elitist":
http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o292/King_Of_The_Mountain/1296877678582.jpg

I was, but then Abyss kept on and I couldnt resist!

at this point I think you are just saying that cuz you are too lazy to actually debate this. I despise a prick who is quick to just call TROLL simply because it gets him out of talking. at first I was actually just trolling and ranting, but then along comes Abyss and he bites. at that point I decide to get serious and I still am, lets home you are too.

@Abyss: Borderlands deffinately looks better on the lowest settings, you do have a point there

XelaisPWN
10-31-2011, 07:11 PM
aww dont feel left out! and yes, on release, the game cost $50, go check Steam sales history. but I must say it is pretty awesome that TF2 went free, I have never seen a company be so kind as to just offer up a game free like that.

Don't even, you and I both know that was to expand TF2's userbase to increase sales to the Mann Co. Shop. Stupid crates.



why not? eh because it costs money I dont have? much as I would love a nice i7 4Ghz processor with quad SLI GTX 590 OC I just dont have the money. besides, Im in the army in 6 months, so why would I blow all that money on something I couldnt enjoy for a long time?

Huh. You're saying that what you have is fine? There's not reason to change much? That seems a bit backwards, seeing as you "dont see whats so superficial with wanting better quality." If you're allowed to be a self-proclaimed PC-Gaming elitist, why can't valve do the same? You see, boys and girls, this is what we call hypocrisy.


either way, this is what I mean when I say "elitist":
http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o292/King_Of_The_Mountain/1296877678582.jpg

I hope you realize that Yahtzee was making fun of elitists like you with that image.


I was, but then Abyss kept on and I couldnt resist!
Then clearly you weren't really "done."


at this point I think you are just saying that cuz you are too lazy to actually debate this. I despise a prick who is quick to just call TROLL simply because it gets him out of talking. at first I was actually just trolling and ranting, but then along comes Abyss and he bites. at that point I decide to get serious and I still am, lets home you are too.

No, I called you a troll because you totally ignored my previous post, and your points contradicted your other points. You said you were done with this argument, yet you keep coming back. Mark my words, I am serious, and I'm serious that people like you are what alienate others from gaming. Thank god for Nintendo and Popcap for preventing assholes like you from actually succeeding. I'm willing to debate that to the end of the earth. If you want more on that, see my first post in this thread. Or don't, because I'm "too lazy to actually debate this" and if you ignore the post it makes you look better. Either way.

LOLWTFBBQ
10-31-2011, 08:48 PM
Huh. You're saying that what you have is fine? There's not reason to change much? That seems a bit backwards, seeing as you "dont see whats so superficial with wanting better quality." If you're allowed to be a self-proclaimed PC-Gaming elitist, why can't valve do the same? You see, boys and girls, this is what we call hypocrisy.

I hope you realize that Yahtzee was making fun of elitists like you with that image.

Then clearly you weren't really "done."

No, I called you a troll because you totally ignored my previous post, and your points contradicted your other points. You said you were done with this argument, yet you keep coming back. Mark my words, I am serious, and I'm serious that people like you are what alienate others from gaming. Thank god for Nintendo and Popcap for preventing assholes like you from actually succeeding. I'm willing to debate that to the end of the earth. If you want more on that, see my first post in this thread. Or don't, because I'm "too lazy to actually debate this" and if you ignore the post it makes you look better. Either way.

no, I am not saying what I have is fine, I just said I would love to have some nice **** under my hood, but I dont, because Im poor. ever sense I started playing Crysis on my old laptop I wanted more quality (I would average 15 fps) and just because I cant max out graphics does not mean Im a hipocrate for wanting to and saying graphics add immersion. Valve can proclaim whatever the **** they want to. weather it is true or not is another story.

yeah, thats why I posted it, I dont consider myself any better than console players, I consider my PC to be better than a PS3. though Im pretty sure that review was for a game he played on the PC

eh okay, if this is so important to you, then I guess I wasnt truly done?

plz state which points contradict each other aside from the fact that I enjoy talking about video games enough to continue this debate (as clearly you and Abyss do as well, otherwise you would stop.) who have I alienated? where did you come up with "people like me?" what have we failed to succeed at? you are now confusing me.

ok lets look at your first post on this thread.
1. There is less replay value in a linear game, less choice
2. writing and plot is quite essential to me, much as I may seem to only care about graphics
3. MineCraft is a pretty sweet game, because its not really supposed to have good graphics. MineCraft is a genius design.
4. Everyone gets alienated by something dude, Im not gonna be an asshole who tells people with laptops to go die. I dont have alot of money to buy nice things either; so plz dont stereotype me as someone who wants to alienate others

abyssion1337
10-31-2011, 09:47 PM
http://i.qkme.me/3fz7.jpg

SplitReality
11-01-2011, 01:20 AM
Man this whole troll thing is STILL going on?

LOLWTFBBQ
11-01-2011, 02:08 AM
It's pretty funny isn't it? Abyss already gave up and started calling me a troll, I find it hard to believe he would be so lazy. I told you I stopped trolling, but sense Abyss and Xelais already engaged me http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn150/kaotic_legion/Memes/successful-troll-is-successful.jpg
Im not even going to try and defend myself :rolleyes:

abyssion1337
11-01-2011, 02:28 AM
In fairness I sad you might be a troll.

jinzo64
11-01-2011, 09:55 AM
this thread is here for some purpose but i'm not sure what

NodMan
11-01-2011, 10:25 AM
Seems its gone from a game to a flame war.

jinzo64
11-01-2011, 10:27 AM
at least we'll be warm in these harsh winter times

Guthix
11-01-2011, 01:13 PM
ok lets look at your first post on this thread.
1. There is less replay value in a linear game, less choice
2. writing and plot is quite essential to me, much as I may seem to only care about graphics
3. MineCraft is a pretty sweet game, because its not really supposed to have good graphics. MineCraft is a genius design.
4. Everyone gets alienated by something dude, Im not gonna be an asshole who tells people with laptops to go die. I dont have alot of money to buy nice things either; so plz dont stereotype me as someone who wants to alienate others

oi oi oi

jinzo64
11-01-2011, 07:10 PM
my laptop controls a powerful orbital laser cannon

LOLWTFBBQ
11-01-2011, 10:30 PM
mine was stolen. then insurance got me a nice new one, with a $500 deductable....

SplitReality
11-01-2011, 11:46 PM
So about people playing Vindictus...

NodMan
11-02-2011, 07:52 AM
What are your names?

NodMan
11-03-2011, 12:25 PM
So I guess only Split, is playing?

Guthix
11-03-2011, 12:27 PM
So I guess only Split, is playing?

tried checking it out but couldnt connet to server so gave up

SplitReality
11-03-2011, 03:26 PM
It was doing an update yesterday.

jinzo64
11-03-2011, 03:29 PM
i forgot what this thread is for.
is there a game on the internet called vindictus?

SplitReality
11-03-2011, 03:36 PM
Yes Jinzo, and it's awesome.

jinzo64
11-03-2011, 03:37 PM
what kinda game is it.

SplitReality
11-03-2011, 03:46 PM
Hm. How to describe it... Try checking the videos from the first post, would explain better than I could most likely.

thedarkmessenger
11-03-2011, 04:27 PM
*checks website* *sees that it's run by the same terrible company that runs Mabinogi and MapleStory* *leaves*

jinzo64
11-03-2011, 04:32 PM
i went back to the first page but had trouble loading the link

SplitReality
11-03-2011, 04:35 PM
Terrible company doesn't mean terrible game. If I used that logic I would never buy anything that had "EA" on it.

Also here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnKJpXZxmyU

thedarkmessenger
11-03-2011, 04:36 PM
yes, but it can ruin a perfectly good game :|

jinzo64
11-03-2011, 04:37 PM
so it's an online hack and slash adventure game i've already got an awsome one of those bleach the soul ressurreccion is awsome

SplitReality
11-03-2011, 04:41 PM
Pretty much. Hack and slash RPG MMO that's pure awesome. Nexon is a horrible company in general but the only thing they do bad at the moment is taking too long to bring the server back up after an update. Nexon just runs it, they didn't make it. I can't vouch for what they might do it in the future but at the moment I don't have any complaints.

thedarkmessenger
11-03-2011, 04:43 PM
meh....I'm not a huge fan of hack and slash anyway. I may try it out sometime in the future, though.

jinzo64
11-03-2011, 04:45 PM
i'm not a big fan off online gaming i don't have the bandwidth to run games online

NodMan
11-04-2011, 12:09 AM
meh....I'm not a huge fan of hack and slash anyway. I may try it out sometime in the future, though.

It doesn't really play like Hack and Slash. Certain aspects of it are far more intense such as the the dynamics or the thought that goes into how you play each class. As well as how high level raids are carried out.


i'm not a big fan off online gaming i don't have the bandwidth to run games online

You don't need it, just join someone that has a good PC and Bandwidth.